300MW燃煤机组脱硫工程一炉一塔与二炉一塔方案比较

戎淑群; 邵峰

doi:10.19666/j.rlfd.2005.10.002

English

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

300MW燃煤机组脱硫工程一炉一塔与二炉一塔方案比较

热力发电 2005年第10期

更新时间：2025-09-28

- 300MW燃煤机组脱硫工程一炉一塔与二炉一塔方案比较
- COMPARISON BETWEEN SCHEME OF ONE BOILER WITH ONE ABSORPTION TOWER AND THAT OF TWO BOILERS WITH ONE TOWER IN DESULFURATION PROJECTS FOR 300 MW COALFIRED UNIT
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 浙江天地环保工程有限公司
  2. 浙江天地环保工程有限公司,浙江,杭州,310012
  3. ,浙江,杭州,310012
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.19666/j.rlfd.2005.10.002
  中图分类号： X701.3
- 纸质出版：2005
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
戎淑群, 邵峰. 300MW燃煤机组脱硫工程一炉一塔与二炉一塔方案比较[J]. 热力发电, 2005,(10).

RONG Shuqun, SHAO Feng. COMPARISON BETWEEN SCHEME OF ONE BOILER WITH ONE ABSORPTION TOWER AND THAT OF TWO BOILERS WITH ONE TOWER IN DESULFURATION PROJECTS FOR 300 MW COALFIRED UNIT[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2005, (10).
戎淑群, 邵峰. 300MW燃煤机组脱硫工程一炉一塔与二炉一塔方案比较[J]. 热力发电, 2005,(10). DOI： 10.19666/j.rlfd.2005.10.002.

RONG Shuqun, SHAO Feng. COMPARISON BETWEEN SCHEME OF ONE BOILER WITH ONE ABSORPTION TOWER AND THAT OF TWO BOILERS WITH ONE TOWER IN DESULFURATION PROJECTS FOR 300 MW COALFIRED UNIT[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2005, (10). DOI： 10.19666/j.rlfd.2005.10.002.

摘要

对300 MW燃煤机组脱硫工程一炉一塔方案与二炉一塔方案的运行维护、场地布置、投资成本和运行成本进行了比较。分析认为

一炉一塔方案有诸多优点

虽一次性投资较高

但运行成本较二炉一塔低

且能适应今后严格的环保要求。

Abstract

The operation and maintenance

as well as yard layout

capital investment

and operation cost of titlementioned schemes have been carried out.It is believed from analysis that the scheme of one boiler with one tower to have many advantages

even though its once forever investiment to be higher.However

the operation cost of it is lower than that of scheme for two boilers with one tower

and it can suit the increasingly strict requirements of environmental protection in the future.

关键词

Keywords

references

浏览量

122

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

关联资源

煤电化学吸收法碳捕集系统水平衡试验

660MW机组湿法烟气脱硫双入口吸收塔内烟气流场模拟

烟尘浓度对湿法脱硫吸收塔的影响及对策

电厂湿法脱硫系统石膏脱水困难的影响因素

取消旁路烟道对湿法烟气脱硫系统的影响及应对措施