两种尿素水解制氨技术理论分析及应用对比

花立存; 吴春华; 马文杰; 朱文瑜; 郑伟

doi:10.19666/j.rlfd.201903056

English

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

两种尿素水解制氨技术理论分析及应用对比

热力发电 2019年48卷第11期页码：135-140

三废处理技术专栏 | 更新时间：2025-09-28

- 两种尿素水解制氨技术理论分析及应用对比
- Theory analysis and application of two kinds of technologies for ammonia production by urea hydrolysis
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 中国电力工程顾问集团西北电力设计院有限公司
  2. 上海电力大学环境与化学工程学院
  3. 成都锐思环保技术股份有限公司
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.19666/j.rlfd.201903056
  中图分类号： X511;TM621
- 网络出版：2019-10-29，
  
  纸质出版：2019
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
花立存, 吴春华, 马文杰, 等. 两种尿素水解制氨技术理论分析及应用对比[J]. 热力发电, 2019,48(11):135-140.

HUA Licun, WU Chunhua, MA Wenjie, et al. Theory analysis and application of two kinds of technologies for ammonia production by urea hydrolysis[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2019, 48(11): 135-140.
花立存, 吴春华, 马文杰, 等. 两种尿素水解制氨技术理论分析及应用对比[J]. 热力发电, 2019,48(11):135-140. DOI： 10.19666/j.rlfd.201903056.

HUA Licun, WU Chunhua, MA Wenjie, et al. Theory analysis and application of two kinds of technologies for ammonia production by urea hydrolysis[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2019, 48(11): 135-140. DOI： 10.19666/j.rlfd.201903056.

摘要

本文介绍和比较了不添加催化剂和添加催化剂2种烟气脱硝用尿素水解制氨技术

对比2种制氨工艺的反应机理、反应速率、能耗、跟随机组负荷变化等情况发现:2种制氨工艺的设计温度为160℃

且该温度下2种制氨工艺的反应速率相同;但加入催化剂—磷酸二氢铵和磷酸氢二铵后

易导致尿素水解反应体系的pH值降低

对反应设备的腐蚀风险性增加;2种制氨工艺的能耗相同

且均能及时响应随机组负荷变化。目前

在电厂制氨工艺中

主要以不添加催化剂的尿素水解工艺为主。

Abstract

Two types of ammonia production technologies by urea hydrolysis for flue gas denitrification were introduced and compared

which include adding catalyst and without adding catalyst. The reaction mechanism

reaction rate

energy consumption and capacity of following the unit load change of the above two ammonia production technologies were theoretically analyzed and practically compared. The results show that

at the designed reaction temperature 160 ℃ for both the two technologies

the reaction rate of them were the same. However

after the catalysts

the ammonium dihydrogen phosphate and diammonium hydrogen phosphate

were added

the p H value of the urea hydrolysis reaction system decreased

which increased the corrosion risk of the hydrolytic equipment. The two technologies had the same energy consumption

and both can meet the demand of load respond. At present

power plants mainly apply the technology of ammonia production without catalyst addition.

关键词

Keywords

references

浏览量

436

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

关联资源

锅炉烟气脱硝尿素热解炉催化水解节能改造

脱硝尿素热解系统沉积物形成原因分析及对策

蜂窝状CuO/γ-Al₂O₃催化剂表征及其烟气脱硝性能研究

选择性催化还原烟气脱硝系统速度场及组分分布对脱硝效率的影响

超超临界1000MW机组加装SCR烟气脱硝装置后煤灰的变化特征分析