登录
English 
学术文献
当期目录
过刊浏览
优先出版作者中心
投稿指南
出版道德声明无数据

登录
English 
学术文献
当期目录
过刊浏览
优先出版作者中心
投稿指南
出版道德声明无数据

1. 国家电投集团内蒙古白音华煤电有限公司坑口发电分公司
2. 西安热工研究院有限公司
3. 长沙理工大学能源与动力工程学院
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
[1]李泽华,周俊波,郭彦君,等.典型碱基吸收剂对燃煤烟气中SO_3的脱除性能实验[J],2025,54(09):154-163.
[1]李泽华,周俊波,郭彦君,等.典型碱基吸收剂对燃煤烟气中SO_3的脱除性能实验[J],2025,54(09):154-163. DOI: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202411253.
DOI:10.19666/j.rlfd.202411253.
燃煤烟气中SO
3
的生成与排放严重威胁着电厂的安全经济运行与大气环境。为此研究了钠基、钙基与镁基吸收剂对SO
3
脱除性能,以及Na_2CO
3
、Ca(OH)
2
与CaO 3种碱基吸收剂在不同运行工况下的SO
3
脱除性能变化。结果表明:在SO
2
与SO
3
共存的条件下,吸收剂均会优先与烟气中的SO
3
发生反应,各种吸收剂对SO
3
的脱除效果从高到低顺序为Na_2CO
3
NaHCO
3
Mg(OH)
2
MgOCa(OH)
2
CaO;在一定实验条件下,当吸收剂与SO
2
化学当量比达2:1后,所有吸收剂对SO
3
的脱除效率均可达80%以上;对NaHCO
3
、Ca(OH)
2
、CaO 3种吸收剂进行煅烧预处理后,其对SO
3
的脱除率略有提高;反应温度、化学当量比和SO
3
初始质量浓度等参数的增加均有利于吸收剂对SO
3
的脱除,而在适当范围内提高H_2O体积分数有利于吸收剂对SO
3
的脱除;吸收剂显著过量时,外扩散是影响化学反应速率的主要控制步骤,而吸收剂类型对其影响较小。
The formation and emission of SO
3
in coal-fired flue gas pose serious threats to both the safe and economical operation of power plants and the atmospheric environment. To solve this problem
the SO
3
removal performance of sodium-based
calcium-based and magnesium-based absorbents is investigated
and the pe
rformance variations of Na_2CO
3
Ca(OH)
2
and CaO under different operating conditions are studied. The results indicate that
under the coexistence of SO
2
and SO
3
the absorbers would react with SO
3
in the flue gas preferentially
and the effectiveness of SO
3
removal by various absorbents ranked from highest to lowest is as follows: Na_2CO
3
NaHCO
3
Mg(OH)
2
MgOCa(OH)
2
CaO. Under certain experimental conditions
the SO
3
removal efficiencies of all the absorbents could reach higher than 80% when the chemical equivalent ratio of absorbent to SO
2
reached 2:1. Pre-calcination treatment for the absorbents enhanced their pore structures
facilitating SO
3
diffusion into the absorbent and improving the SO
3
absorption efficiency. Increasing reaction temperature
chemical equivalent ratio
and initial SO
3
mass concentration can promote the SO
3
removal.Additionally
a moderate increase in H_2O volume fraction aided SO
3
removal. When the absorbent is significantly excessive
external diffusion is the main controlling step affecting the chemical reaction rate
while the type of absorbent has a relatively minor impact on it.
李林欣,李乾军,张雯娣,等.燃煤烟气中SO3的产生及其治理措施[J].化工装备技术, 2018, 39(1):1-6.LI Linxin, LI Qianjun, ZHANG Wendi, et al. The production and control of SO3 in coal-fired flue gas[J].Chemical Equipment Technology, 2018, 39(1):1-6.
刘含笑,陈招妹,王少权,等.燃煤电厂SO3排放特征及其脱除技术[J].环境工程学报, 2019, 13(5):1128-1138.LIU Hanxiao, CHEN Zhaomei, WANG Shaoquan, et al.Emission characteristics and removal technology of SO3from coal-fired power plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2019, 13(5):1128-1138.
WANG Z K, YONG H, LI G L, et al. Sulfur trioxide removal by a Non-Base adsorbent from coal combustion flue gas[J]. Fuel, 2024, 370:131849.
尹子骏,苏胜,钟毓秀,等. SCR催化剂活性组分V对SO2氧化影响的研究[J].动力工程学报, 2023, 43(3):332-340.YIN Zijun, SU Sheng, ZHONG Yuxiu, et al. Study on the effect of active component V of SCR catalyst on SO2oxidation[J]. Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 2023, 43(3):332-340.
SARBASSOV Y, DUAN L, MANOVIC V, et al. Sulfur trioxide formation/emissions in coal-fired air-and oxy-fuel combustion processes:a review[J]. Greenhouse Gases:Science and Technology, 2018, 8(3):402-428.
李小龙,李军状,段玖祥,等.燃煤电厂烟气中SO3协同控制情况及排放现状[J].中国电力, 2019, 52(10):155-161.LI Xiaolong, LI Junzhuang, DUAN Jiuxiang, et al. SO3cooperative control and emission situation in the flue gas of coal-fired power plant[J]. Electric Power, 2019,52(10):155-161.
李欣怡,潘丹萍,胡斌,等.燃煤烟气中SO3迁移转化特性及其控制的研究现状及展望[J].化工进展, 2018,37(12):4887-4896.LI Xinyi, PAN Danping, HU Bin, et al. Research status and prospects of migration, transformation and control of SO3 from coal-fired flue gas[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2018, 37(12):4887-4896.
张杨,冯前伟,杨用龙,等.燃煤电厂烟气SO3排放控制研究进展[J].中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(1):231-248.ZHANG Yang, FENG Qianwei, YANG Yonglong, et al.A review on SO3 emission control of coal-fired power plant[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41(1):231-248.
TING P, SUXIA M, GUANJIA Z, et al. Improving the removal of SO3 aerosol by combining flue gas condensation and alkali spray[J]. Energy, 2023, 272:127143
李高磊,郭沂权,张世博,等.超低排放燃煤电厂SO3生成及控制的试验研究[J].中国电机工程学报, 2019,39(4):1079-1086.LI Gaolei, GUO Yiquan, ZHANG Shibo, et al.Experimental research on SO3 generation and control in ultra-low emission coal-fired power plant[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2019, 39(4):1079-1086.
YUAN H, YUJIE Z. Study on the effect of supercritical CFB boiler air preheater and flue gas treatment facilities on sulfur trioxide emission characteristics[J]. Energy Reports, 2022, 8:926-939.
刘含笑,郦建国,姚宇平,等.低低温电除尘系统对SO3脱除性能研究[J].发电技术, 2022, 43(1):147-154.LIU Hanxiao, LI Jianguo, YAO Yuping, et al. Study on SO3 removal performance of low-low temperature electrostatic precipitator system[J]. Power Generation Technology, 2022, 43(1):147-154.
YANG F, LI Z, LIU H, et al. Emission characteristics of condensable particulate matter and sulfur trioxide from coal-fired power plants[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2021, 94:146-156.
耿一琪,郭彦霞,樊飙,等. CaO基吸附剂捕集CO2及其抗烧结改性研究进展[J].燃料化学学报, 2021,49(7):998-1013.GENG Yiqi, GUO Yanxia, FAN Biao, et al. Research progress of calcium-based adsorbents for CO2 capture and anti-sintering modification[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2021, 49(7):998-1013.
吴永杰,戴永阳.燃煤电厂碱基喷吹脱除三氧化硫的应用研究[J].能源环境保护, 2020, 34(1):60-64.WU Yongjie, DAI Yongyang. The Technology of removing sulfur trioxide by alkaline sorbent injection in a coal-fired power plant[J]. Energy Environmental Protection, 2020, 34(1):60-64.
0
浏览量
50
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621