登录
English 
学术文献
当期目录
过刊浏览
优先出版作者中心
投稿指南
出版道德声明无数据

登录
English 
学术文献
当期目录
过刊浏览
优先出版作者中心
投稿指南
出版道德声明无数据

1. 华北电力大学能源动力与机械工程学院
2. 中国矿业大学(北京)机械与电气工程学院
3. 怀柔实验室山西研究院
4. 中国华能集团清洁能源技术研究院有限公司
纸质出版:2026
移动端阅览
武鑫, 郑明慧, 熊星宇, 等. 基于深度强化学习的固体氧化物电解池蒸汽进汽系统多目标智能控制策略[J]. 热力发电, 2026,(5).
武鑫, 郑明慧, 熊星宇, et al. 基于深度强化学习的固体氧化物电解池蒸汽进汽系统多目标智能控制策略[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2026, (5).
武鑫, 郑明慧, 熊星宇, 等. 基于深度强化学习的固体氧化物电解池蒸汽进汽系统多目标智能控制策略[J]. 热力发电, 2026,(5). DOI: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202505095.
武鑫, 郑明慧, 熊星宇, et al. 基于深度强化学习的固体氧化物电解池蒸汽进汽系统多目标智能控制策略[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2026, (5). DOI: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202505095.
【目的】固体氧化物电解池系统中蒸汽进汽系统的稳定性对提升电解堆的电解效率、延长电解堆寿命至关重要,但蒸汽压力与流量的非线性耦合特性,对控制策略提出了很高要求。【方法】搭建了匹配50 k W级固体氧化物电解池(SOEC)系统的蒸汽进汽系统实验台,研究蒸汽流量误差和压力波动控制。基于采集的实验台运行数据,训练了双延迟深度确定性策略梯度智能体,提出一种基于深度强化学习算法的多目标智能控制(intelligent control
IC)策略,实现了系统输出流量误差不超过3%、压力波动不超过1 kPa的控制目标。【结果】实验表明:IC策略下输出蒸汽流量最大误差为1.4%,压力最大波动量为±0.67 kPa;PID控制方法下系统的稳态输出流量最大误差为3.8%,压力最大波动量为±1.25 k Pa。相较于PID
IC策略下输出蒸汽的流量最大误差减少了63.2%,输出蒸汽压力波动量减少了46.4%。【结论】因此,IC策略控制性能显著优于PID。
[Objective] The stability of the steam inlet system in solid oxide electrolysis cell(SOEC) systems is crucial for enhancing the electrolysis efficiency of the electrolytic stack and prolonging its service life. However
the nonlinear coupling between steam pressure and flow rate imposes high demands on the control strategy. [Methods] An experimental platform for the steam inlet system tailored for the 50 k W-class SOEC system was established to investigate the control of steam flow rate error and pressure fluctuation. Based on the collected operation data of the experimental platform
a double-delay deep deterministic policy gradient agent was trained. A multi-objective intelligent control(IC) strategy based on deep reinforcement learning was proposed
aiming to achieve the control goals of the system output flow error not exceeding 3% and pressure fluctuation not exceeding 1 kPa. [Results] The experimental results show that the maximum error of the output steam flow rate under the IC method is 1.4%
and the maximum pressure fluctuation is ±0.67 kPa. While under the PID control method
the maximum error of the steady-state output flow rate of the system is 3.8%
and the maximum fluctuation of the pressure is ±1.25 kPa. Compared with PID control
the IC method reduces the maximum flow rate error by 63.2% and the pressure fluctuation by 46.4%. [Conclusion] The proposed IC method demonstrates significantly superior control performance compared to the PID method.
0
浏览量
132
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621