登录
English 
学术文献
当期目录
过刊浏览
优先出版作者中心
投稿指南
出版道德声明无数据

登录
English 
学术文献
当期目录
过刊浏览
优先出版作者中心
投稿指南
出版道德声明无数据

1. 润电能源科学技术有限公司
2. 华中科技大学煤燃烧与低碳利用全国重点实验室
3. 西安交通大学能源与动力工程学院
4. 华润电力(锦州)有限公司
5. 武汉理工大学安全科学与应急管理学院
纸质出版:2026
移动端阅览
梁杰, 何闯, 任利明, 等. 660 MW超超临界四角切圆锅炉烟气再循环墙式布置方式优化数值模拟[J]. 热力发电, 2026,(6).
梁杰, 何闯, 任利明, et al. 660 MW超超临界四角切圆锅炉烟气再循环墙式布置方式优化数值模拟[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2026, (6).
梁杰, 何闯, 任利明, 等. 660 MW超超临界四角切圆锅炉烟气再循环墙式布置方式优化数值模拟[J]. 热力发电, 2026,(6). DOI: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202509052.
梁杰, 何闯, 任利明, et al. 660 MW超超临界四角切圆锅炉烟气再循环墙式布置方式优化数值模拟[J]. Thermal Power Generation, 2026, (6). DOI: 10.19666/j.rlfd.202509052.
【目的】针对某660 MW超超临界四角切圆一次再热锅炉在低负荷下再热汽温偏低与屏式过热器局部超温问题,提出了一种燃烧器区域烟气再循环墙式布置方法,旨在实现协同提升再热汽温、抑制屏式过热器(屏过)超温,并确保燃烧稳定。【方法】基于数值模拟方法,在40%额定负荷条件下对该布置方式开展了优化研究:首先对比分析了基准工况以及角式与墙式集中布置烟气再循环方式的效果,进而探讨了墙式分组布置的可行性。【结果】研究结果表明:角式布置会显著增加煤粉气流的着火距离,不利于低负荷下的燃烧稳定;向火侧或背火侧墙式集中布置均可提高高温再热器吸热量,但难以同时缓解屏过局部超温;向火侧墙式分组布置可显著增强高温再热器的吸热效果,但仍存在屏过局部超温风险;背火侧墙式分组布置虽可降低屏过超温风险,但对再热器吸热量的提升效果有限;采用“向火侧下组两层+背火侧上组一层”的分组运行方式,可使高温再热器吸热量提高18.9%,有效缓解屏过局部超温问题,且不恶化燃烧稳定性。【结论】上述研究结果可为新一代煤电机组锅炉在宽负荷范围内的安全、灵活与高效运行提供设计参考和优化依据。
[Objective] To address the issues of low reheated steam temperature and local overheating of platen superheaters(PSH) during low-load operation of a 660 MW ultra-supercritical tangentially fired once-reheat boiler
this study proposed a wall-mounted flue gas recirculation(FGR) arrangement in the burner region. The aim was to synergistically raise reheated steam temperature and suppress PSH overheating while maintaining combustion stability. [Methods] Numerical simulation was performed at 40% rated load to optimize the proposed layout. First
the baseline case and corner-mounted and wall-mounted concentrated FGR arrangements were compared. Subsequently
the feasibility of wall-mounted grouped injection was investigated. [Results] The results indicated that: corner-mounted FGR significantly increased the ignition distance of pulverized coal jets
which adversely affected low-load combustion stability. Both fire-side and rear-side concentrated FGR increased the heat absorption of the high-temperature reheater
but neither could simultaneously mitigate PSH local overheating. Fire-side grouped FGR substantially enhanced heat absorption of the reheater but still carried a risk of PSH overheating
whereas rear-side grouped FGR reduced the overheating risk but yielded only limited reheater improvement. A combined grouped arrangement
in which flue gas was injected through the two lower layers on the fire-side wall together with the upper layer on the rear-side wall
increased the heat absorption of the reheater by 18.9%
effectively mitigated local overheating of the PSH
and maintained stable combustion. [Conclusion] These findings provide design and optimization references for safe
flexible
and efficient boiler operation across wide load ranges in nextgeneration coal-fired power plants.
0
浏览量
60
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621